When a British tourist visits the Louve, who pays whom?

It doesn’t even make economic sense. How much are those missiles and bullets vs the cost of sending a few customs agents to impound the boat?

They’re certain it has drugs, right?

That means less than the Budapest accords.

Members of the security council constantly engage in acts of war without approval from other members.

How did you finish Minecraft?

That such a proposal is even considered is a failure of the international community.

It wasn’t a failure of the Internation community. This was a Trump surprise with no input from anyone but Putin.

It was new to me and I’m on Lemmy several times a day.

It was proved to him that it doesn’t block ai scrapers.

At first I agreed with him. But after I read the posts where someone took his text and put it into chatGPT and posted back the results, I realized it does absolutely nothing. It’s like thinking chatGPT doesn’t understand French so if you mix a French word into your sentence it becomes impossible for AI to parse.

Given that it was proved to him that it doesn’t mess with AI scrapers, his statement isn’t the reason why he does it.

Dahua must have improved their software. I was trying every brand of camera about 8 years ago when I setup my system. The first Dahua I bought required their ActiveX component for Internet Explorer to see the camera output from their web interface!

I agree that Dahua looked better but at the time their web interface was so bad I kept the Hikvisions.

Dahua and Hikvision have great cameras but of course you shouldn’t trust them. Block them at the firewall. I bought mine a few years ago and preferred Hikvision for its better built in webserver for initial configuration.

On the hosting side you run Frigate, Zoneminder or BlueIris (Windows) to control the cameras and record their streams.

Ok, can you make a snorting sound at the front of your nose?

Nope. With effort I can restrict it a little but not close it off.

Suppressed sneezes are from my throat.

I tried it and can feel the release in my throat, not nasal passage.

Blowing out candles is controlling your nasopharynx which every does so food and liquids don’t go up their nose while swallowing. Most everyone can breathe through their mouth instead of their nose.

The OP seems to be describing his nasal passage, not his throat. That seems unusual but I’ve never asked people to know.

One tap and it just does the thing.

Moonlight already does that. You can have an icon on your home screen that when you click it automatically loads a stream connection to your home PC and runs that game.

Now when you tap that icon on the Home Screen, your phone taps into the massive power and connivence of an already working rig at home and streams it to your device!

??? Steam link came out in 2018 and is still available.

Moonlight, Sunshine and Xbox have also been a thing for a very long time.

Or are you mocking their failed Steam Machine?

Gaming on a phone is an abomination. There are many fun time wasters but I want a phone that does less, not more. Internet, Camera, GPS, done.

It sounds like the Apple restriction. Apple lets you “side load” your own program without going through the Apple store but only for your own iphone.

It was no coincidence that pizza gate was started exactly when Trump’s pedophilia story was gaining traction because a woman accused Trump of raping her.

You are doing the libertarian thing and completely and repeatedly ignoring context. Do you also try to argue “woke DEI is the real racism?”

What the fuck are you talking about?

You have made many wrong statements and I have been very patient with you.

misinterpret this letter — exactly as you are doing — to subjugate women in the here and now,

There is no context that excuses the passages.

Using the Bible to subjugate women in the here and now isn’t the argument at all.

We are talking about the Bible.

correcting the record for a historical document that academics understand

The problem is you haven’t corrected anything! You posted a translation that shows absolutely no difference in sexism from other translations. Your claim it was for only for Timothy is refuted by Corinthians. You claim that that the region of Turkey during the time period of Timothy was a Matriarchy is false. Even if it was a matriarchy, it wouldn’t matter because Paul never makes the same proscriptions to men in patriarchal societies. Only women are targeted to be silent and dress modestly. Paul’s writings are inexcusable.

Ephesus is not a patriarchal society

Outside of priestesses, it was a patriarchal society. Greece had priestesses too. The existence of a priestess doesn’t make a patriarchal society.

Prohibitions against dressing fancy for women and only women has nothing to do with combatting paganism. Men participated in the cult of Artemis yet Paul said nothing about restricting men. Paul does not mention paganism nor heresy.

Paul did not make those proscription just for Timothy. He said “I”. Your version did not show any mistranslation.

Corinthians also says woman should not speak in church in so it cannot be a special case only for Timothy.

Where is the admonishment that men should do the same?

What Paul is saying is “If women want to teach, they first need to learn. If they want to learn, they need to stop flaunting their wealth, stop behaving like entitled jerks, and start treating our teachers — who are men — with respect, instead of trying to usurp their positions. We aren’t doing this for clout, but to improve everyone’s lives. Those who haven’t learned the rules are going to make terrible mistakes.”

You just restarted the blatant sexism that everyone complains about.

Maybe changing the context will help you see the problem:

What Paul is saying is "If Blacks want to teach, they first need to learn. If they want to learn, they need to stop flaunting their wealth, stop behaving like entitled jerks, and start treating our teachers — who are White — with respect, instead of trying to usurp their positions.

Is that racist? If you can see the racism, then read your statement again and see the sexism that you defend.