They’re not going to be devastated. No matter how much worse off they will become, they will think they are doing better because the mainstream media of Fox and OAN will tell them they are doing better than ever.
They were fighting for toilet paper under Trump.
Did the prosecutor wait to build an airtight case for 4 years before arresting Luigi?
It’s my opinion that Jack Smith is a conservative who did what he did intentionally.
Hypercard was free for a while.
Windows 3 shipped with Toolbook (hypercard clone) free for a while.
I was hyped to get a Bambu to try stuff like this, then this dropped:
Now I need to find something equivalent.
Mainstream media is far right. Trump sued a newspaper for reporting he was doing a tiny bit behind in polls.
You’ll seek out what you are interested in anyway. But people are paying Google to show you stuff you’d never look for.
Mainstream media is right wing. Small opposition media is being sued by Trump for saying he was a little behind in the polls, or that he lost the Jean Carroll rape defamation case.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/donald-trumps-lawsuits-against-media-companies-2024-12-20/
There is nothing in the case that was new. Therefore Trump could have been in jail while the case was being built.
Do you actually believe that Trump will be arrested in 4 years? Because if not, then the entire idea that he would be exonerated is irrelevant.
You said he shouldn’t have been jailed because without an airtight case, he could have been released. Then what’s the worst that could have happen had he been found not guilty two years ago? He could get reelected? Well look what happened.
Some Republicans joined Democrats in the House in the vote to impeach
Impeach was House. Convict was Senate. Courts did not say nothing could be done without impeachment because there was no court case.
So again, what was in the report that was discovered after the Nov 5th 2024 that would have forced Trump’s conviction?
You are wrong that he should immediately change his app name.
This is a letter from an attorney. It means nothing. It’s legally the same as if I got my buddy to walk up to you and say, “Hey, my friend thinks you have his car. Give us your keys.”
The letter is from a lawyer, not a court. It can be ignored. However I suggest sending a registered letter back to the lawyer to waste their time.
They will not spend the $20,000+ needed to go to trial. (That’s only the court costs that must be paid. Full lawyer fees will be higher) I know this because I once had to sue a contractor. Court fees would have been larger than any money I would have gotten back. Fortunately it was handled through state licensing.
The letter should reference that your project is using the English word that describes the function.
I went through this decades ago because my Internet company name closely matched an extremely large computer manufacturer. I got a letter from an attorney. I wrote a letter back that my company name was the English word for the equipment used for Internet service. That was the end of it.
What specifically was added to Jack Smith’s report after November which would have ensured a conviction?
Everything from the metal detectors, witnesses, and confessions were all known 4 years ago. Arrests started for everyone but Trump in 2021.
Republicans immediately impeached him on the overwhelming evidence. They literally said the next step was the courts: which never happened.
A case so poorly put together that he gets acquitted? A conviction that gets overturned on appeal because the defense didn’t have adequate preparation?
Arrests are made, then the case is put together. That’s the way it works.
They didn’t wait 4 years for Luigi. We had video of Trump telling the crowd to attack.
You really think Trump followers voted for Trump when he was found guilty of fraud only because it wasn’t a criminal case?
Using your excuse, New York v. Trump should not have happened because there was a chance Trump would have been found innocent and that would have given the election to Trump.
Really?
Which is why I linked to his 2022 criminal conviction.
The standard has always been to arrest criminals. It’s never been a problem. Only Trump got a pass.
The judge said rape. The issue wasn’t how hard it is to prosecute criminal vs civil. You started 2 separate arguments.
One was he couldn’t be arrested because that’s not how it is done. That is false. Arresting first is the standard.
The second was that how he was perceived would be a political problem. To which his rape and other fraud convictions are proof it didn’t matter to his followers. The standards to get a guilty verdict in civil cases aren’t relevant.
So Trump and only Trump gets off because we wouldn’t want shitness extended? Wtf?
And a miss would mean nothing just as the fraud and rape convictions meant nothing to them.
In my opinion, Trump in prison without makeup and hair stylists would have had a huge affect on many of his followers who see him as an untouchable strong man. It would have destroyed the illusion he portrays.
Yes, there are different things that need to be proven for different crimes- All of which are done after arrest for every other poor or middle class person arrested.
I had an employee with an ex girlfriend who would call the police to report him for missed child support payments. He would be arrested, thrown in jail over the weekend until Monday morning when the county clerk would be back in office and tell the judge, “Mr. X has been paying his child support, you can release him.”
That’s the legal system for the poor.
Ending subsidies is Musk’s idea. He got billions of tax subsidies to get Tesla started. Now that Tesla is established from those subsidies he wants them cut off so no Tesla competitors can get off the ground.