This is probably in my top 3 favorite Bo songs , especially the latter bit:

You argue and you bicker and you fight
Atheists and Catholics, Jews and Hindus argue day and night
Over what they think is true
But no one entertains the thought that maybe God does not believe in you

You pray so badly for heaven
Knowing any day might be the day that you die
But maybe life on earth could be heaven
Doesn’t just the thought of it make it worth a try?

My love’s the type of thing that you have to earn
And when you earn it you won’t need it

I’m not gonna give you love just 'cause I know that you want me to
If you want love then the love’s gotta come from you

Full Song

Racism is too large a problem in the US to be constrained to a single political party unfortunately, and at no point have I defended the Democrats so I don’t think what I’ve been saying and your feelings of it conflict.

The party platforms switched (largely) due to the platform FDR ran on. Prior to that point, Democrat platform was centered around smaller, limited government.

https://factmyth.com/factoids/democrats-and-republicans-switched-platforms/

However it wasn’t as clean as a single point in time you could point at and say “here, and these policies”. There was no handing over of anything and it wasn’t a cut and dry swap.

This is why a lot of Republicans will argue that the swap didn’t happen, because it was more like an evolution of stances over time with a few big notable shakeups and not really possible to pinpoint.

The source I provided above goes into some key points in history that serve as examples of how the parties switched platforms if that helps to understand it better.

One thing is clear though: the party of Lincoln and today’s Republican Party are similar only in name. For the most part, the same is true for Democrats. They are no longer the same party they were in the time period the other user continues to mention.

I would love to provide a source but going off this particular user’s history it’s likely they will not accept it in good faith. If it is actually being requested I would be happy to oblige.

You’re right, it would be nice if we could refrain from juvenile namecalling or whatabouting.

You are correct there is nuance involving when party platforms switched, but not that the platforms switched.

Continue being in denial all you want but the parties absolutely switched platforms. Everything else in your comment was a deflection from you being wrong about this point.

It’s not a myth, that’s just something Republicans say to blame their past doings on the Democrats of today lol.

The Democrats used to be the party of small government, and Republicans the party of big government. Refusing to believe history doesn’t make you any less wrong.

Also you keep misspelling “gerrymandering”. If you can’t even learn to spell it how do you expect people to believe you understand it?

This was before the parties switched platforms, so it is not the slam dunk you think it is.

You’re totally right I forgot about that part. That’s absolutely covered in the doc.

Ron Watkins. He slipped up and outed himself in a documentary: https://www.vice.com/en/article/q-accidentally-outed-himself-but-qanon-followers-dont-care/

I highly recommend the documentary: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14215442/