• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it even is an ICBM. Ukraine says it’s an ICBM, and they’re 90% confident about that. The US thinks it’s an IRBM, which given the range involved, would make more sense. If it’s an ICBM, then Russia did it just out of spite.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      From wikipedia:

      In principle there is very little difference between a low-performance ICBM and a high-performance IRBM, because decreasing payload mass can increase the range over the ICBM threshold.

      Sounds like different militaries just classifying things differently

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Also the range is the only thing that’s different between them, they can both carry nukes. I suspect they did this to make that point. They want Ukraine to be afraid of launching deep attacks.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Spite, or to make the point that they have nukes and the capability to deliver them. An ICBM - or an IRBM for that matter - evokes nuclear fears, which is why the non-nuclear part needed to be clarified. They’ve been making threats about that recently, so I suspect this is Russia’s version of passive-agressive.