Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

  • NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe… Maaaaaayyyyyyybeeeee the Democrats need to nominate someone who is actually worth getting excited about instead of just being not-Trump.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because if voters are excited, they may start voting in primaries…

      Every since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago, party leaders seem more motivated to make sure their pick wins the primary than a Democrat winning the general.

      “Moderates” seem ineffictive because they’re not trying to just win, they’re trying to win by as little as possible. Like a corrupt pro athlete who’s not throwing the game, but trying to win by less than the spread.

      They know the reason most people vote for moderates like Biden, is if they don’t, someone like trump would win. It’s just the party leaders would rather trade back and forth than let Dems like FDR win every election for decades.

      • keegomatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ever since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago

        Jesus I thought you were exaggerating and then I did the math

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you think that’s bad:

          Biden’s first presidential primary was 35 years ago…

          He was the expected front runner due mainly to his (at the time) exceptional public speaking but got caught plagiarizing speeches, lying about his grades in law school, and even people finding out he cheated while in law school by plagiarising papers.

          But everyone forgot about all that because he spent 8 years standing next to Obama. And the only reason he got that job was to make old white people less uncomfortable voting for a Black guy.

      • Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great way to put it. Both parties are funded by dark money interests, one drives us to the right and the other keeps us in place. This is described as the ratchet effect

        • Elderos@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          and millions are claiming the democrats are radicals, little do they know that the country was more progressive on certain fronts 50 years ago. So they have to resort to blaming gays and trans, because everything else about the current staye of the country is kinda right-wingy to begin with.

  • starrox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a non-US standpoint this is rather easy:

    You have 2 geriatric options. Option 1 would lead to a dictatorship. Option 2 would lead to the - non-ideal - status quo.

    How the fuck do you even have to think about which option would be better???

    • Thurgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Dems have ran non ideal status quo candidates for so long it becomes fatiguing so people stay home or write in Snoop Dogg.

      • starrox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I totally understand the frustration - apathy cannot be a solution in this scenario!

        You’d rather sit at home and watch your democracy go up in flames than just make an “x” on a piece of paper or a screen? Seriously, come on man…

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t cross picket lines, why would I vote for a union buster? Balk all you want but that’s my hard line. Already listed out the local reps I can’t vote for because of the same reason. Y’all can bend your beliefs however you want to justify feedin into the same old cycle but I told them this was my hard line and they crossed it. Fuck them.

    • SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly given the way elections work I’m the us this is a pretty shit line of reasoning

      Trump is a union buster and more

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cool, im not voting for Trump. Whatever happend to be the change you want to see in the world? If more people voted for their best interest candidate, not just whoever has the better chance at winning, maybe our democracy would work.

        • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Until we do away with FPTP voting, you’re essentially throwing your vote away if you don’t vote Democrat or Republican.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            wrong. a party only needs to achieve 5% popular vote to get federal funding next election cycle. everyone should vote for who they actually want.