IANAL But my understanding is that a contract cannot void basic rights.
I think there’s probably a lot of profit in creating the impression among (disproportionately young) users that they can, though.
The terms now say that TikTok users “forever waive” rights to pursue any older claims.
not a lawyer, but i don’t think a company can override a country’s law. If US failed to address this then the constitution is basically useless in the eye of corporation.
…yep!
For sale, one constitution, lightly used.
IANAL, and I get that this varies by country, but at least some of TikTok’s users are in the UK, where the courts have very thoroughly established that some contract terms are automatically unreasonable and are completely unenforceable even if someone agrees to them (the biggest example actually being most non-compete clauses in employment contracts!) This would seem to be one such case. This contract term is so blatantly unreasonable that I don’t see how a court would uphold it even if the users agreed to it.
It should nullify the entire benefit of the contract to the drafter, get every attorney involved disbarred and criminally prosecuted, and incur massive fines.
It really should. It won’t, but it should.
Easy solution don’t use it!
Honesty though aren’t there laws to prevent companies from behaving like this, or are they paying the law makers too well.
From now on, if you see my comments, you automatically give me the right to murder you and your family.
