• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s easier to prevent ovulation of one egg than stop a billion sperm cells from reaching their destination. Stop politicising biology.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah they try to make this sound like an intelligent argument or that they designed birth control for women out of misogyny. It’s much easier to get one or two eggs terminated in a cycle vs eliminating millions of sperm without causing infertility. I don’t think the people that spew this understand.

    • causepix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Uh, it’s been done. Multiple times.

      First was this one back in 2016, but the caveat was that it had the same side effects as women’s birth control. Since the patient being prescribed isn’t the one who will experience negative health outcomes without the medications, the harm of those side effects was deemed by researchers (not the patients themselves) to be greater than the risk of impregnating someone else.

      Other hornonal options have come out since then, though not on the consumer market, like this hormonal gel and this pill.

      More recently its been done without hormones by blocking a vitamin A metabolite that signals the production of sperm.

      You’re the one “politicising biology” by using it to dismiss this out of hand without even the most basic level of research or respect for the complexity of the topic.

    • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s easier to castrate men than to expect women to take medication with a wide array of side potential effects, stop politicising healthcare x